Avg rating:
Your rating:
Total ratings: 2401
Length: 4:28
Plays (last 30 days): 0
These heavy notions creep around
It makes me think long ago
I was brought into this life a little lamb, a little lamb
Courageous, stumbling
Fearless was my middle name
But somewhere there
I lost my way
Everyone walks the same
Expecting me to step
The narrow path they laid
They claim to walk unafraid
I'll be clumsy instead
Hold my love me or leave me high
Say "Keep within the boundaries if you want to play"
Say "Contradiction only makes it harder"
How can I be what I want to be?
When all I want to do is strip away
These stilled constraints
And crush this charade
Shred this sad masquerade
I don't need no persuading
I'll trip, fall, pick myself up
And walk unafraid
I'll be clumsy instead
Hold my love me or leave me high
If I have a bag of rocks to carry as I go
I just want to hold my head up high
I don't care what I have to step over
I'm prepared to look you in the eye
Look me in the eye
And if you see familiarity
Then celebrate the contradiction
Help me when I fall
To walk unafraid
I'll be clumsy instead
Hold my love me or leave me high
Walk unafraid
I'll be clumsy instead
Hold my love me or leave me high
R.E.M. songs are much like good wine. Getting better with age.
Can't agree with you on this one...
REM should be listened to - not stored in a musty cellar!!
Seems a bloody shame to keep the wine for that long too Stick to run-of-the-mill wine and drink it while listening to REM albums you bought with the money saved by buying bargain wines
If they’d still had Bill Berry, 'Up' would have been their very best album. The songwriting is top notch throughout.
Without Berry, it was 'just' a very good album.
I'm willing to concede that the album makes Bill Berry absence noticeable.
Without Berry, it was 'just' a very good album.
I'll get crucified for saying this, but as much as I enjoyed their early-to early-mid stuff (and that's what got me into them waaayyyy back then), I now prefer mid-to-late music of theirs.
Their depth and breadth is almost unparalleled by an American band and I rank them in the top three US bands. I suspect some will disagree.
Anyway, good song in my opinion.
R.E.M. songs are much like good wine. Getting better with age.
This is just an utter-nowhere song.
Depressing crappola ... and another pretentiously-hideous REM album cover "art" ... this one is probably the worst ... along with this song being one of their worst. They've got some genuinely fabulous tunes, and this is not one of them. Pretty much a song that a half-awake 14 year old might write. Only the creepy ending part of the song is usable, possibly as a soundtrack selection for an extended horror film version.
An excellent comment let down only by the confusing use of a : ) for both a smiley and as a close parenthesis.
Michael Stipe's voice and their music have "comforted" many through numerous frightening times. For decades by now. Don't even wanna think about where I'd be had I not had R.E.M. as the soundtrack to youth(s). And beyond.
Unafraid. Now.
An excellent comment let down only by the confusing use of a : ) for both a smiley and as a close parenthesis.
LOVE the f/u recommendation - all for it!
Simply ended up in it is a compliment simply
Over simplified might be a candidate for an overkill.
Confidentially Yours
Is anyone documenting these tidbits of yours, for posterity and/or publication? I'm rarely sure if what you write is influenced by the song on which you post it; still, I find them to be intriguing if not baffling, a good thing I think, a great thing I'm afraid. Keep it up!! Long Live RP!!
Yeah, an REM that I actually almost like.
Not whiny and repetitive like so much of their stuff.
Yeah, well, it was interesting the first time...
Yeah, well, it was interesting the first time...
"Don't bother to respond." You're funny.
As I've pointed out elsewhere, you have a very low threshold for feeling insulted. I don't believe I've ever 'insulted' anyone here for their musical taste; quite the opposite, in fact, I tend to react to those who are ridiculing others for *their* taste. That's what makes me react to your posts. For instance, the Radiohead comment I believe you're referring to was a reply to "RH is a refined taste not for the riffraff." ... and that's a song I rated 6. Hardly what you charactarized it to be. (For what it's worth, I can't imagine I'd ever insult someone for saying a Radiohead song sucks. But I digress.)
For the record, I've rated "Walk Unafraid" at 8. I don't disagree with your opinion about this particular song. Your insulting comments about unrelated songs and their (apparently) obviously incorrect ratings are what I take issue with. You know, what you're trying to project onto me.
One last thing, if I may make a suggestion; don't post while you're angry. It has an adverse effect on your apparent literacy level.
I am glad to know that you were able to magically divine my "apparent" literacy level-you must have either X-Ray vision or you practice sorcery.
I notice that for someone who confidently asserts that I am confusing my musical tastes with an absolute,unquestionable fact-and that you
suspect that no one else thinks that I am as smart as I think I am-you surely do seem to have an incessant need to insult me and many other posters with irrelevant and sarcastic putdowns.Are you sure you weren't looking in the mirror when you vomited up your latest insult? Again, please don't bother to respond.After all,anyone with your obviously "superior " intellect and musical taste shouldn't deign to stoop to ridicule those of us with that have an "inflated" sense of our intellects.Another poster says a Radiohead song sucks,and you ridicule this poster as having an inflated ego.If I were any"smarter,"I would think that your troll like need to insult someone implies that you think that anyone who doesn't have the same reaction that you have to a particular song must be "factually" challenged and deserves your opprobrium-but no,unlike you,I don't have sufficient intelligence to pick up on that contradiction.
"Don't bother to respond." You're funny.
As I've pointed out elsewhere, you have a very low threshold for feeling insulted. I don't believe I've ever 'insulted' anyone here for their musical taste; quite the opposite, in fact, I tend to react to those who are ridiculing others for *their* taste. That's what makes me react to your posts. For instance, the Radiohead comment I believe you're referring to was a reply to "RH is a refined taste not for the riffraff." ... and that's a song I rated 6. Hardly what you charactarized it to be. (For what it's worth, I can't imagine I'd ever insult someone for saying a Radiohead song sucks. But I digress.)
For the record, I've rated "Walk Unafraid" at 8. I don't disagree with your opinion about this particular song. Your insulting comments about unrelated songs and their (apparently) obviously incorrect ratings are what I take issue with. You know, what you're trying to project onto me.
One last thing, if I may make a suggestion; don't post while you're angry. It has an adverse effect on your apparent literacy level.
You appear to be confusing your musical tastes with an absolute, unquestionable fact; hence your confusion. As for the rest ... well, I suspect that no one else thinks you're as smart as you think you are.
I notice that for someone who confidently asserts that I am confusing my musical tastes with an absolute,unquestionable fact-and that you
suspect that no one else thinks that I am as smart as I think I am-you surely do seem to have an incessant need to insult me and many other posters with irrelevant and sarcastic putdowns.Are you sure you weren't looking in the mirror when you vomited up your latest insult? Again, please don't bother to respond.After all,anyone with your obviously "superior " intellect and musical taste shouldn't deign to stoop to ridicule those of us with that have an "inflated" sense of our intellects.Another poster says a Radiohead song sucks,and you ridicule this poster as having an inflated ego.If I were any"smarter,"I would think that your troll like need to insult someone implies that you think that anyone who doesn't have the same reaction that you have to a particular song must be "factually" challenged and deserves your opprobrium-but no,unlike you,I don't have sufficient intelligence to pick up on that contradiction.
Simply ended up in it is a compliment simply
Over simplified might be a candidate for an overkill.
Confidentially Yours
You appear to be confusing your musical tastes with an absolute, unquestionable fact; hence your confusion. As for the rest ... well, I suspect that no one else thinks you're as smart as you think you are.
Next time try not being so insulting to others musical opinions yourself. You are welcome to say what you like or dislike about a song but when you do exactly what you are criticizing , then you lose all validity.
Excuse me,I seem to remember that you told me in a previous reply to a previous post that I should get my head out of my ass for expressing my intense dislike of a song.Suggesting that someone is tone deaf is very mild by comparison-and as I also recall,I did implicitly suggest that you no longer bother responding to my posts.You again are displaying proof that your intelligence is,shall we say,limited.Please do not make this personal,because if I find out who you are,you and I will have problems-and by all means,please do complain to Bill the moderator that I threatened you.I DO NOT appreciate someone chiding me for the very behavior that you engaged in in an initial response to my criticism of a song.
Ok break it up boys and go to your respective corners. It's only Rock n roll
Next time try not being so insulting to others musical opinions yourself. You are welcome to say what you like or dislike about a song but when you do exactly what you are criticizing , then you lose all validity.
Excuse me,I seem to remember that you told me in a previous reply to a previous post that I should get my head out of my ass for expressing my intense dislike of a song.Suggesting that someone is tone deaf is very mild by comparison-and as I also recall,I did implicitly suggest that you no longer bother responding to my posts.You again are displaying proof that your intelligence is,shall we say,limited.Please do not make this personal,because if I find out who you are,you and I will have problems-and by all means,please do complain to Bill the moderator that I threatened you.I DO NOT appreciate someone chiding me for the very behavior that you engaged in in an initial response to my criticism of a song.
Next time try not being so insulting to others musical opinions yourself. You are welcome to say what you like or dislike about a song but when you do exactly what you are criticizing , then you lose all validity.
You can be as defiant as you want. I'm definitely not into this song....
marvelous...
I agree!
PS: Did the Pope ever get back to you?
marvelous...
Everybody in my church loves this song...
Thank you for not dissing Monster I like their last two albums quite a bit, but they were marred by the terrible production courtesy of Jackknife, er, Butterknife Lee or whatever his name is....
Still great - also, R.E.M.'s last truly essential song to me. While I like some of their post-Up output, I suppose I wouldn't really miss any of it.
I effing LOVE this song. LOVE.
Oh, I see what you did there ;)
And yes, it rocks, live.
Yup.. nice. 7.
REM: one of the best
A comment equal to your moniker. Disposable.
<- Unafraid
( clumsy instead)
Love their sound
- You will not like them on the stereo.
- You will not like them on the radio.
- You will not like them on your ipod.
- You will not like them with your buddy Todd.
- You will not like them with a mouse.
- You will not like them in a house.
- You will not like them here or there.
- You will not like them anywhere.
EXACTLY!!!!
Loving 50% of an album is a let down? I consider a CD great if I love three tracks.
.300 may be a terrific single-season batting average, but as a percent of good songs on album... well to me it indicates $14 down the drain.
Better lean into it. So as not to get blown over.
Keep walking.
unafraid
Better lean into it. So as not to get blown over.
Keep walking.
- You will not like them on the stereo.
- You will not like them on the radio.
- You will not like them on your ipod.
- You will not like them with your buddy Todd.
- You will not like them with a mouse.
- You will not like them in a house.
- You will not like them here or there.
- You will not like them anywhere.
This definitely has a high rehash factor!
I'm mostly a slavish R.E.M. devotee, in no little part because I started listening to them when they were brand new, saw them in itty bitty clubs, and that was just at the time in my life when I was first out on my own in beautiful Boston. But I know just what you mean; I would anticipate new albums like crazy, and when they came out I'd say I loved about 50% of it.
Loving 50% of an album is a let down? I consider a CD great if I love three tracks.
I'm mostly a slavish R.E.M. devotee, in no little part because I started listening to them when they were brand new, saw them in itty bitty clubs, and that was just at the time in my life when I was first out on my own in beautiful Boston. But I know just what you mean; I would anticipate new albums like crazy, and when they came out I'd say I loved about 50% of it.
If you like their music, they're profound. If you dislike their music, they're full of shit. It's called perspective.
Nobody can tell you what to like. Welcome to adulthood.
Better lean into it. So as not to get blown over.
Keep walking.
pushkinjim, what is your problem with REM? Did Stipe reject your advances at a party one time or something? We get it...you don't like them. You don't have to say so on every song on RP. Now, go away!
Lots of REM and Coldplay haters on this site, that's for sure. I am not one of them.