Avg rating:
Your rating:
Total ratings: 2383
Length: 3:45
Plays (last 30 days): 2
MUSAK. Before the internet, extreme music fads were for the strangely male pseudo-interlectuals. I was a proud member of a club of one (another problem of the pre- internet world) until I found my soul mate, Tony. He proudly explained to me that the music I loved to hate was in fact called MUSAK. We would endlessly listen to vinyl found in junk shops on his high end 3 ton turntable (record players were for the, well, others!). This ensemble (not group) did not exist back then but they would have been raised up high as heroic members of the genre, or would they.......
I LIKE IT! Stop being over-analytical and listen to it!
why do I feel like William could fill a whole day with versions of Gnossienne No. 1?
Because he could - and if he can he Should!
another one of them songs that make you feel like wanting to sneak around.
Ya Sidi on YouTube
We'll hear it when they make a movie about his life.
That is a funny song comment!
But actually, I believe Erik Satie would likely have applauded this interpretation of his composition, while (literally) sneering at more conventional performances as "imitative." The man was unconventional, to say the very least! And he did not consider most of his own compositions to be at all "serious" musically.
From Wikipedia:
"The (Gnossienne) are for the most part in free time (lacking time signatures or bar divisions) and highly experimental with form, rhythm and chordal structure. The form as well as the term was invented by Satie."
(Yes, Bill, I think you're right on with your own comment)!
This leaves me wondering what could have been born from a Eric Satie / Philip Glass collaboration if their time on this planet would have overlapped!
I am Satiesfied with this version.
Oh gno you didn't
This would not have felt out of place on the Pulp Fiction soundtrack.
I think Satie would appreciate it.
I think he's absolutely hate it. It's just a melody over a tediously predictable backing, and has none of the incredible mystery of the original.
Sounds like Combustible Edison, who I believe did the "Four Rooms" soundtrack. They also invented a cocktail by the same name...it has campari and you set it on fire!
My thought, exactly!
Bought their first album when I had listened to one of their songs on the radio late at night. Very relaxing and fun.
That is a funny song comment!
But actually, I believe Erik Satie would likely have applauded this interpretation of his composition, while (literally) sneering at more conventional performances as "imitative." The man was unconventional, to say the very least! And he did not consider most of his own compositions to be at all "serious" musically.
From Wikipedia:
"The (Gnossienne) are for the most part in free time (lacking time signatures or bar divisions) and highly experimental with form, rhythm and chordal structure. The form as well as the term was invented by Satie."
(Yes, Bill, I think you're right on with your own comment)!
We need some Esquivel on RP.
Replacing his tombstone with a magnet and wrapping his corpse in copper wire, one could make a donation of several kWh to RP's power bill!
At fist I was going to simply comment, "très luisant," but people who haven't played the piece wouldn't get it. I realize now that the image didn't really add much clarity and should have included the explanation.
Another lay explanation of how unusual Satie's scoring is - written music is usually divided into measures, or "bars," with vertical lines between them. Each measure represents the repeating "1-2-3-4" that repeats throughout the piece. Satie didn't bother with those. The excerpt below would typically be divided into four measures. Just another thing that makes studying and playing his music more unusual and interesting.
stanohlohovec5 wrote:
sorry.. I am a musician .. but this partiture is unintelligible for me.. Can you explain it? Be very pleasing..;)))
sorry.. I am a musician .. but this partiture is unintelligible for me.. Can you explain it? Be very pleasing..;)))
Satie wrote several pieces which could be considered "circus-like".
bump!
That is a funny song comment!
But actually, I believe Erik Satie would likely have applauded this interpretation of his composition, while (literally) sneering at more conventional performances as "imitative." The man was unconventional, to say the very least! And he did not consider most of his own compositions to be at all "serious" musically.
From Wikipedia:
"The (Gnossienne) are for the most part in free time (lacking time signatures or bar divisions) and highly experimental with form, rhythm and chordal structure. The form as well as the term was invented by Satie."
(Yes, Bill, I think you're right on with your own comment)!
This is too "exotic" for Lawrence Welk, pretty cool though.
"Last year I gave several lectures on "Intelligence and Musicality among Animals" ... Today I am going to speak to you about "Intelligence and Musicality among Critics" ... The subject is much the same, with some modifications, of course."
There, there, now.
I'll bet that old Frenchman is dancing in his grave!
There, there, now.
I'll bet that old Frenchman is dancing in his grave!