Avg rating:
Your rating:
Total ratings: 1146
Length: 5:24
Plays (last 30 days): 1
Tell me, sister morphine, when are you coming round again?
Oh, I don't think I can wait that long
Oh, you see that Im not that strong
The scream of the ambulance is sounding in my ears
Tell me, sister morphine, how long have I been lying here?
What am I doing in this place?
Why does the doctor have no face?
Oh, I can't crawl across the floor
Ah, can't you see, sister morphine, Im trying to score
Well it just goes to show
Things are not what they seem
Please, sister morphine, turn my nightmares into dreams
Oh, can't you see Im fading fast?
And that this shot will be my last
Sweet cousin cocaine, lay your cool cool hand on my head
Ah, come on, sister morphine, you better make up my bed
Cause you know and I know in the morning I'll be dead
Yeah, and you can sit around, yeah and you can watch all the
Clean white sheets stained red.
TAYLOR DIN'T PLAY ON THIS -
Lead Vocal: Mick Jagger
Acoustic Guitar: Keith Richards
Slide Guitar: Ry Cooder
Bass: Bill Wyman
Drums: Charlie Watts
Piano: Jack Nitzsche
That said there should be an 11 for this.
garyalex wrote:
Mick Taylor - damn.
TAYLOR DIN'T PLAY ON THIS -
Lead Vocal: Mick Jagger
Acoustic Guitar: Keith Richards
Slide Guitar: Ry Cooder
Bass: Bill Wyman
Drums: Charlie Watts
Piano: Jack Nitzsche
I'll never understand why gas bags spend so much time comparing apples and oranges when it comes to music. The Beatles were great. Led Zeppelin was great. The Stones are great. None greater than the other. Just different. We're incredibly fortunate to have all 3, along with 100s of other fantastic bands from their original era right up to the present. Why not just enjoy them instead of trying to quantify, qualify, and contrast them?
Well put! Sometimes I get an itch that only Dylan can scratch . . . other times the itch may call for Motorhead. Do we argue about which is better than the other? Both great, yet so different from each other.
If you think the Stones are a "1-trick pony" then you obviously haven't listened to the Stones.
The variety of styles on this album alone is staggering.
or perhaps even... Jaggering!
All hail the 'Stones
If you think the Stones are a "1-trick pony" then you obviously haven't listened to the Stones.
The variety of styles on this album alone is staggering.
WORD.
Slide guitar on 'SIster Morhine' -
RY COODER
If you think the Stones are a "1-trick pony" then you obviously haven't listened to the Stones.
The variety of styles on this album alone is staggering.
Yep, agreed. The Stones are an awesome band, really incredible, and this necessarily must include topics like musicality, musicianship, production, writing. Reflecting on that time, we are so fantastically lucky to have it!
That said, The Beatles were better. Sorry, but IMO there are key places where The Beatles leave The Rolling Stones (and all other 20th century music) behind, and that is the intertwined effect of musicality, musicianship, and production. The key link here might well be George Martin's brilliant involvement. The Beatles flat out covered much more ground than the Stones, or Zep, or Floyd, etc... they were the 800 lb. gorilla in that musical period's living room. Yea, The Stones rack it up on the Blues front, but they were kind of a 1-trick-pony on that, and I even prefer Led Zeppelin to The Stones in this category, but The Beatles went there, tasted it, dabbled, and moved on to many other things that including defining their own ground that has and continues to be emulated.
I'll never understand why gas bags spend so much time comparing apples and oranges when it comes to music. The Beatles were great. Led Zeppelin was great. The Stones are great. None greater than the other. Just different. We're incredibly fortunate to have all 3, along with 100s of other fantastic bands from their original era right up to the present. Why not just enjoy them instead of trying to quantify, qualify, and contrast them?
No better streak of five records in the history of rock and roll - And the pre-Revolver Beatles- poppy as they were - are in my book better than the pre Banquet Stones.
Yep, agreed. The Stones are an awesome band, really incredible, and this necessarily must include topics like musicality, musicianship, production, writing. Reflecting on that time, we are so fantastically lucky to have it!
That said, The Beatles were better. Sorry, but IMO there are key places where The Beatles leave The Rolling Stones (and all other 20th century music) behind, and that is the intertwined effect of musicality, musicianship, and production. The key link here might well be George Martin's brilliant involvement. The Beatles flat out covered much more ground than the Stones, or Zep, or Floyd, etc... they were the 800 lb. gorilla in that musical period's living room. Yea, The Stones rack it up on the Blues front, but they were kind of a 1-trick-pony on that, and I even prefer Led Zeppelin to The Stones in this category, but The Beatles went there, tasted it, dabbled, and moved on to many other things that including defining their own ground that has and continues to be emulated.
Peter_Bradshaw wrote:
Her's is great, and the it's original (at least, she wrote it... not sure who recorded first) but i have to say that i like this one a smidge better.. the guitar work is exceptional.
yes, it's great!
So the wifi comes is good at the camp?
For whom?
Lazarus wrote:
we be dancing...
Can you really dance to this song? I guess late in the song it's possible, but it takes almost three minutes to kick all the way in.
'Til then, it's a morbid tale about shooting up!
1. 69 to 73 is not early Stones - they put out 6 albums of totally or mostly covers from Newest Hitmakers to Decembers Children, then 4 albums of largely original tunes from Aftermath to Satanic Majesties before the 4 ridiculously greater than great records that start your list (I would group the fantastic Get Yer Ya Ya's Out live album rather than GHS) but that's a quibble.
2. The fair Beatles comparison would be Revolver, Sgt. Pepper, White Album, Let it Be and Abbey Road - "Candy Floss Pop" my ass .
No better streak of five records in the history of rock and roll - And the pre-Revolver Beatles- poppy as they were - are in my book better than the pre Banquet Stones.
Her's is great, and the it's original (at least, she wrote it... not sure who recorded first) but i have to say that i like this one a smidge better.. the guitar work is exceptional.
Well it was part of the Holy Quadrilogy (if you will): Beggar's Banquet, Let it Bleed, Sticky Fingers, Exile On Main Street.
An incredible string of 4 consecutive crazy-good albums.
(Edit; just noticed a similar post below. I'm just not a big fan of Goat's Head Soup)
My favorite Stones LP -- i"m in the minority, but I just LOVE this one, yes more than Exile, etc.
Which roughly corresponds to the period when Mick Taylor played with them (OK, he joined in 1969).
I think he had a lot to do with this being their best period (I would extend the streak to "It's only Rock n Roll" in 1974).
It's funny how I still think of Ron Wood as "the new guy".
scrubbrush wrote:
All these songs at least alude to the smack and the people who use it
The Stranglers - Golden Brown
Pink Floyd - Comfortably Numb
Neil Young - The Needle and the Damage Done
Rolling Stones - Dead Flowers
Red Hot Chili Peppers - Under The Bridge
Velvet Underground - Heroin (and any number of other songs)
Guns N' Roses – Mr. Brownstone
The Stranglers - Golden Brown
Pink Floyd - Comfortably Numb
Jane's Addiction - Jane Says
Hand of Doom - Black Sabbath
Lynyrd Skynyrd - The Needle and the Spoon
Gil Scott-Heron - Home is Where the Hatred is
The Black Crowes - She Talks to Angels
Iggy Pop - Lust for Life
In other words, a lot of great music has been written about Herion
it's all personal opinion and mine is just that but I'd venture to say your comment is a bloviating monument to triteness
All these songs at least alude to the smack and the people who use it
The Stranglers - Golden Brown
Pink Floyd - Comfortably Numb
Neil Young - The Needle and the Damage Done
Rolling Stones - Dead Flowers
Red Hot Chili Peppers - Under The Bridge
Velvet Underground - Heroin (and any number of other songs)
Guns N' Roses – Mr. Brownstone
The Stranglers - Golden Brown
Pink Floyd - Comfortably Numb
Jane's Addiction - Jane Says
Hand of Doom - Black Sabbath
Lynyrd Skynyrd - The Needle and the Spoon
Gil Scott-Heron - Home is Where the Hatred is
The Black Crowes - She Talks to Angels
Iggy Pop - Lust for Life
In other words, a lot of great music has been written about Herion
So what's the best? I can't think of ten, but my vote for the top one is "Carmelita" by Warren Zevon. If it's not the best, it's at least the prettiest.
Depends on the day. Sticky Fingers is definitely in the top 2 or 3. Exile, Let It Bleed, Beggars Banquet, and maybe even Tattoo You or Some Girls could be considered their best.
Co written by Marianne Faithfull so I think the former and so bravo Mick.
I think it is, why does the doctor have no face, myself. What a song...
Haunting
I remember my mum in her last weeks skipping down the hallway like a school girl on liquid morph for the pain. Miss you xx
That changes the imagery in an interesting way. I've always heard "Why... does the doctor... have no face?"
They were much more musically interesting when Mick Taylor was with them.
I always thought that Mick Taylor was better than the rest of the Rolling Stones in terms of musicianship, especially Keith Richards, but oddly I like the earlier albums the best up through Let It Bleed with the original Stones.
They were much more musically interesting when Mick Taylor was with them.
context - ANY context - with the STONES!
Are you an American soldier as a base in Frankfort?
That would be your only excuse!
THE ONLY ONE!!
"This isn't right, this isn't even wrong."
- Wolfgang Pauli (1900-1958), upon reading a young physicist's paper
From a perfect album.
Nah ... actually, she was with Mick first, then Keith.
Keith was not with Marianne Faithfull on any regular basis. Anita Pallenberg - who had dated Brian Jones previously - was with Keith by the time of this song, and for several years after.
(Frankfurt, Germany, Home of the EAGLES!)
"If you sniff on the cover of 'Sticky Fingers' you'll get high!
Excellent song though ..."
===================================================
Pleease!!!!
NEVER NEVER NEVER EVER mention the STONES in the
context - ANY context - with the STONES!
Are you an American soldier as a base in Frankfort?
That would be your only excuse!
THE ONLY ONE!!
Puzzling. Apparently Stingray has been sniffing the cover.
Pleease!!!!
NEVER NEVER NEVER EVER mention the STONES in the
context - ANY context - with the STONES!
BTW, great song! 9!
(Frankfurt, Germany, Home of the EAGLES!)
"If you sniff on the cover of 'Sticky Fingers' you'll get high!
Excellent song though ..."
===================================================
Pleease!!!!
NEVER NEVER NEVER EVER mention the STONES in the
context - ANY context - with the STONES!
Are you an American soldier as a base in Frankfort?
That would be your only excuse!
THE ONLY ONE!!
Nah ... actually, she was with Mick first, then Keith.
RIGHT!
Those I knew who played w/needles back then . . . all gone.
alive and kickin'....
when did your love came around last time...?
True, that.
Ditto, except I give Ry a higher score than you do.
Those I knew who played w/needles back then . . . all gone.
IMNSHO, the best Stones song ever. Great music coupled with fantastic lyrics from Marianne Faithful.
Daveinbawlmer wrote:
Not about drugs per se, about a car accident victim given morphine for pain.
Uh ... ya might want to take another listen.
I was fascinated by this song when I was a kid in the 70s. Somehow, in my teenage mind, it made drugs seem both frightening and cool. Maybe because the lyrics are so honest. Hmm.
Contaminator wrote:
I'm way over teen age and still think that drugs are frightening... and cool, in some way.
Ya, me too. I had some mighty good times in the day, but . . . then . . . . Hmm.
Not much of a Stones fan but I don't recall this one and it is interesting.
Always amusing to read the cultural clash in the comments. hehe
Nah ... actually, she was with Mick first, then Keith.
TAYLOR DIN'T PLAY ON THIS -
Lead Vocal: Mick Jagger
Acoustic Guitar: Keith Richards
Slide Guitar: Ry Cooder
Bass: Bill Wyman
Drums: Charlie Watts
Piano: Jack Nitzsche
Wasn't it Nicky Hopkins, a very long time session piano player for them? Let me please,
give the book of Julian Dawson as lecture, if you don' t mind-
Yours,..